@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008625,
 author = {石井, 拓児 and Ishii, Takuji},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要 (教育科学)},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {The purpose of this paper is an investigation of the effectiveness that the theory of dividing education matters into internal items and external items has on educational administration studies. The theory was introduced by Seiya Munakata. He grasped that external items were educational administrative processes and internal items were educational processes. Thus, he did not have an idea how the curriculum was planed and decided and who could have a voice in its planning. On the other hand, Eiichi Mochida insisted that we should regard internal matters as a problem of educational administrative processes. His thinking is important. The First is that educational administrative processes and educational processes are unified in his theory. The second is that a school is the place where the two processes will be unified. I suggest that we should divide education matters into internal items and external items and inquire into the system of educational administrative processes in internal matters. That is the most important subject of educational administration studies because the local community and parents are primarity interested in the curriculum in their areas. In Japan the process of constructing the curriculum in a school has been merely a formality. Because the state and local school boards must utilize the national curriculum in the form of official advice, thus we cannot have the theoretical and practical subject. We can regard the above theory of dividing education matters as a conceptual tool for analyzing the educational administration system in Japan.},
 pages = {93--102},
 title = {内外事項区分論における概念把握の方法をめぐる問題について},
 volume = {47},
 year = {2000}
}