{"_buckets": {"deposit": "fca43ceb-4466-49c1-9775-8fcbae04d856"}, "_deposit": {"id": "8833", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "8833"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008833", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["87603"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2008-09-16", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "167", "bibliographicPageStart": "149", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "37", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "国際開発研究フォーラム", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Forum of International Development Studies", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "A provision concerning the jurisdiction ratione personae (personal jurisdiction) of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia (ECCC) is vague and it may be envisaged that the drafters failed to take into account the definition of both \"senior leaders\" and \"those most responsible\" clauses. The ECCC can interpret personal jurisdiction to promote either peace or justice. In either case the conception of personal jurisdiction will be critically different. If taking the justice approach, the ECCC could indict more individuals who were responsible for crimes under its jurisdiction. But if favoring peace, there will be fewer individuals to be indicted. To examine the drafting history of the Agreement between the United Nations and the Royal Government of Cambodia concerning the Prosecution under Cambodian Law of Crimes Committed during the Period of Democratic Kampuchea (the Agreement) is evident that the drafters took the peace approach because they were not in a position to create tribunals to try each individual who was involved in the Khmer Rouge atrocities. However, the original approach of the UN and the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) was likely towards justice, and it shifted to peace after the UN encountered international pressure and the RGC encountered internal upheaval. Eventually, they targeted only a few senior leaders and those who ware most responsible for conceptualizing serious crimes and violations. It might be conceived that Cambodia could enjoy peace and political stability because the vast majority of Khmer Rouge culprits did not fear being prosecuted under the ECCC jurisdiction. Therefore, they would be less likely to participate in armed struggle in response to any appeal made by their former leaders to retaliate against the establishment of the tribunal. In consideration of the contemporary situation in Cambodia, this paper observes that the drafters might be correct in opting out for the peace approach in order to maintain political stability and public security. Yet, the justice approach remains important for long term social sustainability and development. In addition, although a judicial process is conducted adhering to fundamental human rights, fairness and the due process of law, the standards of the ECCC is still low because of limiting personal jurisdiction to only a few individuals. This paper also finds that the ECCC was created based on a compromise between these approaches but that it is likely to put more stress on peace than justice. In the end, it might achieve only relative justice.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/forids.37.149", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院国際開発研究科", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_61": {"attribute_name": "ISSN（Online）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "2189-9126", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "EISSN"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN（print）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1341-3732", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_9_text_14": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "KONG, Sam Onn", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "87603", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-19"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "08.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "6.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 6100000.0, "url": {"label": "08.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/8833/files/08.pdf"}, "version_id": "533851af-4866-4dcc-9edc-8c9bd88e0ab7"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Jurisdiction Ratione Personae of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia: Peace vs. Justice", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Jurisdiction Ratione Personae of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia: Peace vs. Justice", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1056"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/forids.37.149", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2008-10-10"}, "publish_date": "2008-10-10", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "8833", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Jurisdiction Ratione Personae of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia: Peace vs. Justice"], "weko_shared_id": -1}