{"created":"2021-03-01T06:15:49.779204+00:00","id":9080,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"9db92cae-c5dd-4277-a751-f2ce52a58eec"},"_deposit":{"id":"9080","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"9080"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009080","sets":["323:324:325"]},"author_link":["25472","25473"],"item_10_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"The Potential of Lesson Analysis for Theoretical Construction in Education : Focused on its Method by T. Shigematsu and Y. Hibi","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_10_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-06","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"202","bibliographicPageStart":"189","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"74","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"教育学研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では、教育学の基礎研究として、重松鷹泰(1961)以来の授業分析の意義を再確認するとともに、重松の授業分析の方法や、それにもとづく日比裕ら(1989)による授業諸要因の関連構造の考え方を参考にしながら、授業の理論的構造を記述するための方法を展開する。授業研究と対比すれば、授業分析は、教育学における理論構築を指向している。重松の授業分析では、授業の記録が質的に分析され、解釈学的な方法によって理論的知見がもたらされる。このためには、次の5つの条件を満たす必要がある。(1)事実にもとづく理論構成。(2)教育実践からの参照可能性のある理論構成。(3)可塑性のある理論構成。(4)子どもの思考過程の解明。(5)動的な把握。日比らの授業諸要因の関連構造の研究では、教室で観察され記録された事実や出来事が、授業諸要因とその関連構造として、再構成される。これは、研究方法論上の原理においては、5つの条件を満たすものである。しかし、子どもの生きた経験の世界を研究しながら、概念的な知見を導き出すためには解釈を必要とし、事実に基づき理論的な構造を構成するのには困難を伴う。そのため分析手法のレベルにおいては、これまでの研究では、第3の条件である可塑性のある理論構成を満たすまでには至っていない。このためには、新しい関連構造の記述法が開発されなければならない。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"In this paper, the author considers the meaning of the type of \"Lesson Analysis\" (jugyou bunseki) which was proposed by Takayasu Shigematsu (1961) as a Japanese study on educational practice. Based on the method of this analysis and \"relational structure of the pedagogical factors\" by Yutaka Hibi et al. (1989), the issues of the method for describing the theoretical structure of the learning process in the classroom are discussed. Lesson analysis is preferred for constructing academic theories of education, where lesson study (jugyou kenkyu) tends to provide an opportunity for improving the classroom lessons and contributing toward teachers' professional development in the school. In Shigematsu's lesson analysis, researchers use audio and visual data and collect various data related to children's learning process such as compositions, notebooks, and other products. These data are analyzed qualitatively and the theoretical findings are produced which can provide an explanation for the whole events observed in the classroom using a hermeneutic approach. To produce an theory through lesson analysis, the method of this research has to meet five conditions: 1) constructing face-based theory, 2) making theory relevant for educational practice, 3) constructing theory with adaptability, 4) clarifying the children's thinking process, 5) and taking a dynamic and relativistic approach. Studies on the relational structure of pedagogical factors have been conducted since the 1980's in the division of education methods in Nagoya University. In these studies the facts and events that were observed or recorded in the classroom were theoretically reconstructed as pedagogical factors within the relational structure. It is further confirmed that they must meet the five conditions. But the process of the analysis requires the researcher's interpretation to find conceptual knowledge in researching children's lived experiences. Therefore, it is difficult to produce theoretical structures based on empirical evidence. For this purpose, a new method for describing the relational structure must be developed.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"(<特集>教育現場の多様化と教育学の課題) (<Special Issue>Diversification of Research Field in Educational Studies)","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10_identifier_60":{"attribute_name":"URI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_type":"HDL","subitem_identifier_uri":"http://hdl.handle.net/2237/10845"}]},"item_10_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"日本教育学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10_relation_43":{"attribute_name":"関連情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type":"isVersionOf","subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006343571/","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_10_rights_12":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"日本教育学会","subitem_rights_language":"ja"},{"subitem_rights":"本文データは学協会の許諾に基づきCiNiiから複製したものである","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_10_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03873161","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_10_text_14":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"application/pdf"}]},"item_1615787544753":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"柴田, 好章","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"25472","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"SHIBATA, Yoshiaki","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"25473","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-02-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"shibata_1017.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"shibata_1017.pdf","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/9080/files/shibata_1017.pdf"},"version_id":"35e12de6-7f53-4158-a95c-ac98b88d3621"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"授業分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"授業研究","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"教育学研究法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"授業諸要因の関連構造","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"lesson analysis","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"lesson study","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"methods of educational research","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"relational structure of pedagogical factors","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"教育学研究における知的生産としての授業分析の可能性 : 重松鷹泰・日比裕の授業分析の方法を手がかりに","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"教育学研究における知的生産としての授業分析の可能性 : 重松鷹泰・日比裕の授業分析の方法を手がかりに","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10","owner":"1","path":["325"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2009-01-21"},"publish_date":"2009-01-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"9080","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["教育学研究における知的生産としての授業分析の可能性 : 重松鷹泰・日比裕の授業分析の方法を手がかりに"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-16T03:54:38.333032+00:00"}