WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "108bb476-fb91-4ead-8a6c-fc8018852d3a"}, "_deposit": {"id": "14354", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "14354"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00014354", "sets": ["862"]}, "author_link": ["44606", "44607"], "item_10_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "System on Special Permission of Residence for Foreigners in Australia : In Comparison with Japanese System", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_10_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2011-12-25", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "152", "bibliographicPageStart": "131", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "37", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "オーストラリア研究紀要", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_10_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The Ministerial Intervention system in Australia is equivalent with the Japanese system of Special Permission of Residence, in terms that the system allows foreigners staying illegally to give legal status to live in the country regardless of migration law and regulation. Under the Australia’s Migration Act, applicant can apply review to independent review bodies, which are Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal. Migration Act enables the Minister for Immigration to give more“favorable”decision to the applicant, if applicants are unsuccessful in the review at the tribunals. This is called“Ministerial Intervention”and the Minister can legalize foreigners’ legal status even though he or she cannot obtain visa to stay in Australia under the Migration Act. As this Ministerial Intervention powers have been used occasionally, guidelines are set up to decide to which cases Minister should intervene or not.“Unique and exceptional circumstances”are main determinants of the reason to intervene, which is understood as a situation where removal of the foreigner results in significant hardships. In comparison, the Japanese system is embodied in the deportation process of illegal residents in Japan. Minister for Justice can legalize particular foreigners if he or she presents strong and compelling reason to stay in Japan, such as the fact that he or she is married with Japanese citizen. Comparison of the guidelines of both countries shows some differences. Australia’s guideline put emphasis on expected human right abuses if he or she is deported to his or her home country, however, Japan’s guideline rather put emphasis on the positive reason and situation he or she should be allowed to stay in Japan. However, it is very important that the power to give legal residence to foreigners who have no legal background in the host country is embodied in both countries’ immigration law, even though both countries’ immigration laws and policies have very different nature. This shows the inevitability of certain amount of the existence of discretion in the immigration laws and policies, as it is very difficult to legislate and to anticipate every possible circumstance of human beings.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261"}]}, "item_10_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "追手門学院大学", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10_rights_12": {"attribute_name": "権利", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_rights": "この論文の著作権は追手門学院大学オーストラリア研究所に帰属します", "subitem_rights_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_10_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0385-3446", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_1615787544753": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "浅川, 晃広", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "44606", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Asakawa, Akihiro", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "44607", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-20"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "738.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 738600.0, "url": {"label": "Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/14354/files/Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf"}, "version_id": "ea33729a-00ac-420a-9454-8a96a39f5efa"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_type_id": "10", "owner": "1", "path": ["862"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2012-04-16"}, "publish_date": "2012-04-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "14354", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261556d88f6-7fa5-4814-8d01-4aed9e9bf8ff
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf (738.6 kB)
|
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-04-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | System on Special Permission of Residence for Foreigners in Australia : In Comparison with Japanese System | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
著者 |
浅川, 晃広
× 浅川, 晃広× Asakawa, Akihiro |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
権利 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
権利情報 | この論文の著作権は追手門学院大学オーストラリア研究所に帰属します | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述 | The Ministerial Intervention system in Australia is equivalent with the Japanese system of Special Permission of Residence, in terms that the system allows foreigners staying illegally to give legal status to live in the country regardless of migration law and regulation. Under the Australia’s Migration Act, applicant can apply review to independent review bodies, which are Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal. Migration Act enables the Minister for Immigration to give more“favorable”decision to the applicant, if applicants are unsuccessful in the review at the tribunals. This is called“Ministerial Intervention”and the Minister can legalize foreigners’ legal status even though he or she cannot obtain visa to stay in Australia under the Migration Act. As this Ministerial Intervention powers have been used occasionally, guidelines are set up to decide to which cases Minister should intervene or not.“Unique and exceptional circumstances”are main determinants of the reason to intervene, which is understood as a situation where removal of the foreigner results in significant hardships. In comparison, the Japanese system is embodied in the deportation process of illegal residents in Japan. Minister for Justice can legalize particular foreigners if he or she presents strong and compelling reason to stay in Japan, such as the fact that he or she is married with Japanese citizen. Comparison of the guidelines of both countries shows some differences. Australia’s guideline put emphasis on expected human right abuses if he or she is deported to his or her home country, however, Japan’s guideline rather put emphasis on the positive reason and situation he or she should be allowed to stay in Japan. However, it is very important that the power to give legal residence to foreigners who have no legal background in the host country is embodied in both countries’ immigration law, even though both countries’ immigration laws and policies have very different nature. This shows the inevitability of certain amount of the existence of discretion in the immigration laws and policies, as it is very difficult to legislate and to anticipate every possible circumstance of human beings. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 追手門学院大学 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプresource | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | journal article | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0385-3446 | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : オーストラリア研究紀要 巻 37, p. 131-152, 発行日 2011-12-25 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |