ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. D100 大学院国際開発研究科
  2. D100a 雑誌掲載論文
  3. 学術雑誌

オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261
556d88f6-7fa5-4814-8d01-4aed9e9bf8ff
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf Asakawa_Akihiro.pdf (738.6 kB)
アイテムタイプ 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2012-04-16
タイトル
タイトル オーストラリアにおける外国人在留特別許可制度 : 日本との比較を念頭に
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル System on Special Permission of Residence for Foreigners in Australia : In Comparison with Japanese System
著者 浅川, 晃広

× 浅川, 晃広

WEKO 44606

ja 浅川, 晃広

Search repository
Asakawa, Akihiro

× Asakawa, Akihiro

WEKO 44607

en Asakawa, Akihiro

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利
権利情報 この論文の著作権は追手門学院大学オーストラリア研究所に帰属します
言語 ja
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The Ministerial Intervention system in Australia is equivalent with the Japanese system of Special Permission of Residence, in terms that the system allows foreigners staying illegally to give legal status to live in the country regardless of migration law and regulation. Under the Australia’s Migration Act, applicant can apply review to independent review bodies, which are Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal. Migration Act enables the Minister for Immigration to give more“favorable”decision to the applicant, if applicants are unsuccessful in the review at the tribunals. This is called“Ministerial Intervention”and the Minister can legalize foreigners’ legal status even though he or she cannot obtain visa to stay in Australia under the Migration Act. As this Ministerial Intervention powers have been used occasionally, guidelines are set up to decide to which cases Minister should intervene or not.“Unique and exceptional circumstances”are main determinants of the reason to intervene, which is understood as a situation where removal of the foreigner results in significant hardships. In comparison, the Japanese system is embodied in the deportation process of illegal residents in Japan. Minister for Justice can legalize particular foreigners if he or she presents strong and compelling reason to stay in Japan, such as the fact that he or she is married with Japanese citizen. Comparison of the guidelines of both countries shows some differences. Australia’s guideline put emphasis on expected human right abuses if he or she is deported to his or her home country, however, Japan’s guideline rather put emphasis on the positive reason and situation he or she should be allowed to stay in Japan. However, it is very important that the power to give legal residence to foreigners who have no legal background in the host country is embodied in both countries’ immigration law, even though both countries’ immigration laws and policies have very different nature. This shows the inevitability of certain amount of the existence of discretion in the immigration laws and policies, as it is very difficult to legislate and to anticipate every possible circumstance of human beings.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 追手門学院大学
言語 ja
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプresource http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ journal article
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0385-3446
書誌情報 ja : オーストラリア研究紀要

巻 37, p. 131-152, 発行日 2011-12-25
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
URI
識別子 http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16261
識別子タイプ HDL
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 18:09:56.901110
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3