WEKO3
AND
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "7859a8d8-1d0a-426a-87e0-1ac7732416d8"}, "_deposit": {"id": "15014", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "15014"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015014"}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2012-10", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "191", "bibliographicPageEnd": "42", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "GSID Discussion Paper"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Numerous existing empirical studies agreed that economic integration contributes to poverty reduction on the basis that it accelerates growth \u2018on average,\u2019 while being neutral to the distribution of benefits, again \u2018on average.\u2019 However, in reality, there exists a number of \u2018dispersion\u2019 in these \u2018average\u2019 relationships, both from the transnational and chronological aspects. Hence, this research intends to empirically elaborate a \u2018cross-national study\u2019 on the \u2018interstate dispersion\u2019 of the impact (growth, inequality, and poverty) that international economic integration provides to the developing economies, along with the specific factors that determine the outcome in each nation such as socio-economic institutions and policy stances. Regression analyses are conducted for the major segments of the P-G-I triangle, paying special attention to the time dimensions of the impacts by using S-T, M-T and L-T growth spells. Having confirmed average relationships, the factors of dispersions\u2500both common factors (variations in explanatory variables) and country-specific factors (fixed effects)\u2500are explored. This paper confirms: 1) the absolute income convergence in each income group (with divergence between income groups); 2) the conditional income convergence among countries across income groups; and 3) the absolute (and, of course, conditional) convergence in inequality (GINI) and poverty headcount ratios (HCR) across countries. Unlike the earlier studies that found higher inequality elasticity of poverty reduction, this study, with many growth spells taken from the countries in transition including the FSU states, finds higher elasticity of poverty reduction for economic growth. In terms of the time dimensions of the emergence of impacts, the paper finds relatively higher significance of \u2018institutions\u2019 with lower significance of \u2018policy stances\u2019 in the longer growth spells. Among the three dimensions of integration tested in this study (international trade, FDI, and remittances), higher significance exists in: 1) FDI (positive) in economic growth; 2) FDI (negative) and trade (positive) in the income of bottom quintile relative to national average; and 3) remittances (negative) in poverty (i.e., reduce poverty headcount ratio), but not with sufficient statistical significance (at least not yet). Trade is mostly neutral to income distribution (GINI) while FDI and remittances tend to exert negative and positive impacts, respectively. Institutional quality as measured in the investor-oriented ICRG indicators, while promoting overall economic growth, affects equality (GINI and bottom quintile income relative to the country average) negatively. As the combined result of the P-G-I triangle, however, higher institutional quality (ICRG indicators) reduces poverty (HCR).", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16949"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID\u767b\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/disp.191.1", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u5927\u5b66\u9662\u56fd\u969b\u958b\u767a\u7814\u7a76\u79d1"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "HIRANO, Yumeka"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "46276", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "OTSUBO, Shigeru"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "46277", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-20"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "191.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "7.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 7300000.0, "url": {"label": "191.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/15014/files/191.pdf"}, "version_id": "6c29032c-dba7-4cb4-9e5a-068b4d2c90c1"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "\u30ad\u30fc\u30ef\u30fc\u30c9", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "Poverty", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Income Distribution", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Inequality", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Growth", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Globalization", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Institutions", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Fixed Effects", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle under Globalization: Time Dimensions and the Control Factors of the Impacts of Integration", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle under Globalization: Time Dimensions and the Control Factors of the Impacts of Integration"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["608/609/700"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/disp.191.1", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2012-11-12"}, "publish_date": "2012-11-12", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "15014", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle under Globalization: Time Dimensions and the Control Factors of the Impacts of Integration"], "weko_shared_id": null}
Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle under Globalization: Time Dimensions and the Control Factors of the Impacts of Integration
https://doi.org/10.18999/disp.191.1
b185e64f-48ce-4d41-81bc-0bdda52fd681
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-11-12 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle under Globalization: Time Dimensions and the Control Factors of the Impacts of Integration | |||||
著者 |
HIRANO, Yumeka
× HIRANO, Yumeka× OTSUBO, Shigeru |
|||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Poverty | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Income Distribution | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Inequality | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Growth | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Globalization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Institutions | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Fixed Effects | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述 | Numerous existing empirical studies agreed that economic integration contributes to poverty reduction on the basis that it accelerates growth ‘on average,’ while being neutral to the distribution of benefits, again ‘on average.’ However, in reality, there exists a number of ‘dispersion’ in these ‘average’ relationships, both from the transnational and chronological aspects. Hence, this research intends to empirically elaborate a ‘cross-national study’ on the ‘interstate dispersion’ of the impact (growth, inequality, and poverty) that international economic integration provides to the developing economies, along with the specific factors that determine the outcome in each nation such as socio-economic institutions and policy stances. Regression analyses are conducted for the major segments of the P-G-I triangle, paying special attention to the time dimensions of the impacts by using S-T, M-T and L-T growth spells. Having confirmed average relationships, the factors of dispersions─both common factors (variations in explanatory variables) and country-specific factors (fixed effects)─are explored. This paper confirms: 1) the absolute income convergence in each income group (with divergence between income groups); 2) the conditional income convergence among countries across income groups; and 3) the absolute (and, of course, conditional) convergence in inequality (GINI) and poverty headcount ratios (HCR) across countries. Unlike the earlier studies that found higher inequality elasticity of poverty reduction, this study, with many growth spells taken from the countries in transition including the FSU states, finds higher elasticity of poverty reduction for economic growth. In terms of the time dimensions of the emergence of impacts, the paper finds relatively higher significance of ‘institutions’ with lower significance of ‘policy stances’ in the longer growth spells. Among the three dimensions of integration tested in this study (international trade, FDI, and remittances), higher significance exists in: 1) FDI (positive) in economic growth; 2) FDI (negative) and trade (positive) in the income of bottom quintile relative to national average; and 3) remittances (negative) in poverty (i.e., reduce poverty headcount ratio), but not with sufficient statistical significance (at least not yet). Trade is mostly neutral to income distribution (GINI) while FDI and remittances tend to exert negative and positive impacts, respectively. Institutional quality as measured in the investor-oriented ICRG indicators, while promoting overall economic growth, affects equality (GINI and bottom quintile income relative to the country average) negatively. As the combined result of the P-G-I triangle, however, higher institutional quality (ICRG indicators) reduces poverty (HCR). | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 名古屋大学大学院国際開発研究科 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18999/disp.191.1 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
書誌情報 |
GSID Discussion Paper 号 191, p. 1-42, 発行日 2012-10 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/16949 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |