{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6a2ec9f6-dea8-465f-b17e-768e332af2f0"}, "_deposit": {"id": "18020", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "18020"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018020"}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2010-05-01", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "xxxiv", "bibliographicPageStart": "i", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "4", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "CALE Discussion Paper"}]}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "\u5185\u5bb9\u8a18\u8ff0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "A THESIS SUBMITTED IN TOTAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF LAW", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "p.i-xviii, 1-228, i-xxxiv", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID\u767b\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/caledp.4.i", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "Center for Asian Legal Exchange (CALE)"}]}, "item_9_relation_43": {"attribute_name": "\u7570\u7248\u3067\u3042\u308b", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isVersionOf", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "http://cale.law.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publication/DiscussionPaper.html", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Pham, Hong Quang"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "86928", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "caledp_4.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "2.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 2300000.0, "url": {"label": "caledp_4.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/18020/files/caledp_4.pdf"}, "version_id": "889e2bcd-0aae-461c-a52e-094ef0a4e672"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION COURT IN VIETNAM: MODEL, JURISDICTION AND LESSONS FROM FOREIGN EXPERIENCES", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION COURT IN VIETNAM: MODEL, JURISDICTION AND LESSONS FROM FOREIGN EXPERIENCES"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1604/1605/1611/2575"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.4.i", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_name_i18n": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2014-06-06"}, "publish_date": "2014-06-06", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "18020", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION COURT IN VIETNAM: MODEL, JURISDICTION AND LESSONS FROM FOREIGN EXPERIENCES"], "weko_shared_id": 3}