WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6abe1361-332e-4a40-af8f-f9eadb01b668"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 17, "id": "18978", "owners": [17], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "18978"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018978", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["55282", "55283"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2014-12-25", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "26", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "259", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大學法政論集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The 2013 Amendment to the Japanese Antimonopoly Act, promulgated on 13 December 2013, abolished the current Hearing Procedure System for administrative appeals administered by the Japan Fair Trade Commission. However the New Amendment raises a number of problems concerning procedural issues, including independence of the Japan Fair Trade Commission, limitations of judicial review, and exclusive jurisdiction of the Tokyo District Court. This article reviews related discussions regarding these issues and points out additional possible grounds for the criticism of the 2013 Amendment. In addition, following the abolition of the Hearing Procedure System, the 2013 Amendment sets out new provisions on hearing procedures under the Antimonopoly Act. This article thus makes a detailed comparison between the newly enacted provisions on hearing procedures under the Antimonopoly Act and the relevant provisions under the Administrative Procedure Act, which is Japan’s main law on administrative procedures. By comparing these provisions, the author examines to what extent procedural fairness is accomplished under the Antimonopoly Act.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/21082"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nujlp.259.1", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院法学研究科", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0439-5905", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "HAYASHI, Shuya", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "55282", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "林, 秀弥", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "55283", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "nujlp_259_1.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1300000.0, "url": {"label": "nujlp_259_1.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/18978/files/nujlp_259_1.pdf"}, "version_id": "ac80aac7-fe5b-4f5b-8439-ac868aa08963"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "The 2013 Amendment to the Antimonopoly Act : Procedural Fairness under Japanese Competition Law", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The 2013 Amendment to the Antimonopoly Act : Procedural Fairness under Japanese Competition Law", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "17", "path": ["1671"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nujlp.259.1", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2015-01-16"}, "publish_date": "2015-01-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "18978", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The 2013 Amendment to the Antimonopoly Act : Procedural Fairness under Japanese Competition Law"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
The 2013 Amendment to the Antimonopoly Act : Procedural Fairness under Japanese Competition Law
https://doi.org/10.18999/nujlp.259.1
https://doi.org/10.18999/nujlp.259.1d44fccce-ca5b-4802-9247-68ec5a5503bc
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
nujlp_259_1.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2015-01-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The 2013 Amendment to the Antimonopoly Act : Procedural Fairness under Japanese Competition Law | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
著者 |
HAYASHI, Shuya
× HAYASHI, Shuya× 林, 秀弥 |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述 | The 2013 Amendment to the Japanese Antimonopoly Act, promulgated on 13 December 2013, abolished the current Hearing Procedure System for administrative appeals administered by the Japan Fair Trade Commission. However the New Amendment raises a number of problems concerning procedural issues, including independence of the Japan Fair Trade Commission, limitations of judicial review, and exclusive jurisdiction of the Tokyo District Court. This article reviews related discussions regarding these issues and points out additional possible grounds for the criticism of the 2013 Amendment. In addition, following the abolition of the Hearing Procedure System, the 2013 Amendment sets out new provisions on hearing procedures under the Antimonopoly Act. This article thus makes a detailed comparison between the newly enacted provisions on hearing procedures under the Antimonopoly Act and the relevant provisions under the Administrative Procedure Act, which is Japan’s main law on administrative procedures. By comparing these provisions, the author examines to what extent procedural fairness is accomplished under the Antimonopoly Act. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 名古屋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18999/nujlp.259.1 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
ISSN(print) | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0439-5905 | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 名古屋大學法政論集 巻 259, p. 1-26, 発行日 2014-12-25 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/21082 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |