ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "9fbee559-3e3c-41e9-a434-94f37e6ef98c"}, "_deposit": {"id": "2003940", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2003940"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02003940", "sets": ["1666746480158"]}, "author_link": [], "control_number": "2003940", "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "The Baccalaureate “Commentary on Texts” : Structure and Formulas for Logically and Critically Discussing Literature", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2022-10-15", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "25", "bibliographicPageStart": "15", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "69", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Educational Sciences", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper holds up one example of a method of critical thinking and analysis in essay-test form. The “commentary on texts” (commentaire de texte), one of the essay formats for the French language subject of the French baccalaureate exam. presents an example of how an analysis of literature combined with knowledge of how to write a commentary via a problem-solving method, can prove effective. Providing a structure for writing commentary makes it possible for high school students to write logical and critical textual commentaries by mastering essay formulas. This paper argues that through training in commentary on texts, one can develop meta-abilities, such as the ability to find a perspective for analysis and create complex arguments in a logical manner--qualities which have often been regarded as something alien to literary appreciation. The mechanism for logically discussing literature is to write paragraphs in terms of the basic blocks of argumentation (claim + argument + citation + validity of citation), called the ICQ principle, and then build up these basic blocks from each of the three analytical perspectives to create the overall structure. This consistent structure made up of integral blocks of argumentation and large textual commentary allows for rigorous argumentation; at the same time, it allows the “reader” to gain a sense of what elements of a text are “logical.” This structure allows the “writer” to organize and assemble multiple ideas and conduct complex arguments in a logical manner. Analyzing a literary text involves clarifying six elements called the “textual identity card”--the explanation of the text positioned in its literary movement and historical context, its literary genre, the theme, register, type of text, and author’s intent and purpose. The text is then broken down into elements according to meaning, and three perspectives for analyzing the text are presented that constitute the hypotheses used for textual interpretation. The principle that determines the order of the three perspectives structures them side by side, starting with the simplest and most obvious and working up to the more complex. This principle of order is also applied when determining the order of claims and examples in arguing each perspective. Consistently following this ordering principle also helps to maintain logical coherence. Since there is an understanding between the student and the grader of the basic rules and methods of analysis for writing commentary on literary texts, there is no need for the student to develop an argument from scratch. This type of test offers a solid criteria for all high school students in France to take and receive clearly interpreted scores on their secondary school completion examinations by means of essay questions.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nueduca.69.1.15", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "収録物識別子", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1346-0307", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "渡邉, 雅子", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "WATANABE, Masako Ema", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2022-10-26"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "nueduca6901_02.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "445 KB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 445000.0, "url": {"objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2003940/files/nueduca6901_02.pdf"}, "version_id": "3c8b742d-1e60-47d1-99a6-85f6203e523c"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "バカロレアの「テクスト評釈」 : 文学を論理的,批判的に論じる型と公式", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "バカロレアの「テクスト評釈」 : 文学を論理的,批判的に論じる型と公式", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_type_id": "40001", "owner": "1", "path": ["1666746480158"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.69.1.15", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2022-10-26"}, "publish_date": "2022-10-26", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2003940", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["バカロレアの「テクスト評釈」 : 文学を論理的,批判的に論じる型と公式"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A200 教育学部/教育発達科学研究科
  2. A200b 紀要
  3. 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
  4. 69(1)

バカロレアの「テクスト評釈」 : 文学を論理的,批判的に論じる型と公式

https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.69.1.15
https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.69.1.15
7ff280d9-7197-46ad-b400-1551106f5a4f
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
nueduca6901_02.pdf nueduca6901_02.pdf (445 KB)
Item type itemtype_ver1(1)
公開日 2022-10-26
タイトル
タイトル バカロレアの「テクスト評釈」 : 文学を論理的,批判的に論じる型と公式
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル The Baccalaureate “Commentary on Texts” : Structure and Formulas for Logically and Critically Discussing Literature
言語 en
著者 渡邉, 雅子

× 渡邉, 雅子

ja 渡邉, 雅子

en WATANABE, Masako Ema

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
内容記述
内容記述 This paper holds up one example of a method of critical thinking and analysis in essay-test form. The “commentary on texts” (commentaire de texte), one of the essay formats for the French language subject of the French baccalaureate exam. presents an example of how an analysis of literature combined with knowledge of how to write a commentary via a problem-solving method, can prove effective. Providing a structure for writing commentary makes it possible for high school students to write logical and critical textual commentaries by mastering essay formulas. This paper argues that through training in commentary on texts, one can develop meta-abilities, such as the ability to find a perspective for analysis and create complex arguments in a logical manner--qualities which have often been regarded as something alien to literary appreciation. The mechanism for logically discussing literature is to write paragraphs in terms of the basic blocks of argumentation (claim + argument + citation + validity of citation), called the ICQ principle, and then build up these basic blocks from each of the three analytical perspectives to create the overall structure. This consistent structure made up of integral blocks of argumentation and large textual commentary allows for rigorous argumentation; at the same time, it allows the “reader” to gain a sense of what elements of a text are “logical.” This structure allows the “writer” to organize and assemble multiple ideas and conduct complex arguments in a logical manner. Analyzing a literary text involves clarifying six elements called the “textual identity card”--the explanation of the text positioned in its literary movement and historical context, its literary genre, the theme, register, type of text, and author’s intent and purpose. The text is then broken down into elements according to meaning, and three perspectives for analyzing the text are presented that constitute the hypotheses used for textual interpretation. The principle that determines the order of the three perspectives structures them side by side, starting with the simplest and most obvious and working up to the more complex. This principle of order is also applied when determining the order of claims and examples in arguing each perspective. Consistently following this ordering principle also helps to maintain logical coherence. Since there is an understanding between the student and the grader of the basic rules and methods of analysis for writing commentary on literary texts, there is no need for the student to develop an argument from scratch. This type of test offers a solid criteria for all high school students in France to take and receive clearly interpreted scores on their secondary school completion examinations by means of essay questions.
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプresource http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/nueduca.69.1.15
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1346-0307
書誌情報 ja : 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
en : Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Educational Sciences

巻 69, 号 1, p. 15-25, 発行日 2022-10-15
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2022-10-26 01:30:58.206767
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3