Item type |
itemtype_ver1(1) |
公開日 |
2023-05-26 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Hook plate fixation versus locking plate fixation for distal clavicle fracture: a multicenter propensity score-matched study |
|
言語 |
en |
著者 |
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Takegami, Yasuhiko
Tokutake, Katsuhiro
Katayama, Yujiro
Imagama, Shiro
|
アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
権利 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
権利情報Resource |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
|
権利情報 |
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
distal clavicle fracture |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
locking plate |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
hook plate |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
clavicle |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
propensity score matching |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
Hook plate fixation and locking plate fixation are two standard internal fixation implants for treating distal clavicle fractures. We aimed to clarify the following: 1) Does the locking plate offer better clinical outcomes than the hook plate? 2) Is bone union better with a locking plate than hook plate? and 3) Are complications different between the locking plate and hook plate? We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 338 patients who underwent surgery from 2014 to 2018 in our 10 hospitals, which comprise the TRON group. Of them, 208 patients treated using any plates were eligible. After 30 patients were excluded for various reasons, 178 patients were included. We classified them into two groups, locking plate group (Group L) and hook plate group (Group H), using propensity score matching. We confirmed bone union with an X-ray, evaluated the UCLA shoulder score, and compared the frequency of complications. After matching, Group L and Group H included 49 patients each. The UCLA score was higher in Group L than in Group H at each follow-up point. We confirmed bone union in all patients in Group L, but it was not confirmed in three patients (6.1%) in Group H. No statistically significant differences were observed except for plate migration, which was observed in nine patients (18.4%) in Group H but in no patients in Group L. The postoperative UCLA score was significantly better in Group L. We recommend the locking plate as a surgical treatment for distal clavicle fractures. |
|
言語 |
en |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
|
言語 |
en |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Medicine |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
departmental bulletin paper |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
ID登録 |
|
|
ID登録 |
10.18999/nagjms.85.2.223 |
|
ID登録タイプ |
JaLC |
関連情報 |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isVersionOf |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
URI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://www.med.nagoya-u.ac.jp/medlib/nagoya_j_med_sci/852.html |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
PISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0027-7622 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
EISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
2186-3326 |
書誌情報 |
en : Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
巻 85,
号 2,
p. 223-232,
発行日 2023-05
|