ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "47d3cc34-de86-430f-a2fb-6110b95db4ba"}, "_deposit": {"id": "2020", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2020"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002020", "sets": ["386"]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他の言語のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "INTERVIEW VS. QUESTIONNAIRE METHOD IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION RATINGS"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1975-09-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "102", "bibliographicPageStart": "83", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "22", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The present study has two purposes. The first is to investigate the differential effects of interview vs. questionnaire method upon personality impression ratings. The second is to cast some lights upon the importance of using not only a \"like-dislike\" scale but also some scales which represent important personality dimensions. Ninety-nine female undergraduates served as subjects in the interview method. They were given one of three sets of stimulus each of which is composed of two personality traits, and asked to describe orally impressions of each of three stimulus-persons (SP) who were described by each of two traits and by both two traits. Then they were asked to rate impressions of each SP on ten personality-rating scales (7-points) and a \"like-dislike\" scale (21-points) After description followed by ratings of the first, of the second, and of the third SP, they were asked to answer the questions about changes of denotation of each trait when presented in a set from presented alone, and to rate the relative degree of contribution of the two traits in making impressions of the two-size SP, difficulty of making images of SPs in mind, and the degree of relatedness of the two traits. In the questionnaire method, subjects were two hundreds and fifteen female undergraduates. They were given two sets and were asked to rate six SPs on twelve rating scales, which were composed of the same eleven scales as in the interview method and 7-points \"like-dislike\" scale. Stimulus sets were also the same as in the interview method. They were not asked to describe SPs verbally. The rersults obtained are as follows : (1) 11 rating scales were classified into three groups, referring results obtained by means of factor analysis. They were designated as the social desirability scales (4 scales), the activity scales (2), and others (5), respectively. (2) Three response patterns were discriminated in terms of the relationship among the three rating values in the set : the averaging, the additive, and the odd. The odd pattern which were unaccountable by any of linear models, appeared more frequently in the interview than the questionnaire method. The rest were, on the other hand, observed more frequently in the questionnaire than in the interview method. (3) Fitness of data obtained to the simple averaging model was better in the questionnaire than in the interview method. (4) The odd pattern appeared more frequently and fitness to the simple averging model was worse in the social desirability scales than in the activity scales.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/3443"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/bulfep.22.83", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学教育学部"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "03874796", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_9_text_14": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大橋, 正夫"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5113", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "OHASHI, Masao"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5114", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "平林, 進"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5115", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "HIRABAYASHI, Susumu"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5116", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "長戸, 啓子"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5117", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "NAGATO, Keiko"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5118", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "吉田, 俊和"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5119", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "YOSHIDA, Toshikazu"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5120", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "佐伯, 道治"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5121", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "SAHEKI, Michiharu"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5122", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00000137005.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "2.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 2100000.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00000137005.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2020/files/KJ00000137005.pdf"}, "version_id": "fbfee906-c556-4733-b83d-340e0b6669a4"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "\u003c原著\u003e性格の印象評定における面接法と質問紙法", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "\u003c原著\u003e性格の印象評定における面接法と質問紙法"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["386"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/bulfep.22.83", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2006-01-06"}, "publish_date": "2006-01-06", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2020", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["\u003c原著\u003e性格の印象評定における面接法と質問紙法"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. A200 教育学部/教育発達科学研究科
  2. A200b 紀要
  3. 名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科
  4. 22

<原著>性格の印象評定における面接法と質問紙法

https://doi.org/10.18999/bulfep.22.83
https://doi.org/10.18999/bulfep.22.83
4cb9bc24-1c1a-4a61-9481-1468c322b228
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KJ00000137005.pdf KJ00000137005.pdf (2.1 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2006-01-06
タイトル
タイトル <原著>性格の印象評定における面接法と質問紙法
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル INTERVIEW VS. QUESTIONNAIRE METHOD IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION RATINGS
著者 大橋, 正夫

× 大橋, 正夫

WEKO 5113

大橋, 正夫

Search repository
OHASHI, Masao

× OHASHI, Masao

WEKO 5114

OHASHI, Masao

Search repository
平林, 進

× 平林, 進

WEKO 5115

平林, 進

Search repository
HIRABAYASHI, Susumu

× HIRABAYASHI, Susumu

WEKO 5116

HIRABAYASHI, Susumu

Search repository
長戸, 啓子

× 長戸, 啓子

WEKO 5117

長戸, 啓子

Search repository
NAGATO, Keiko

× NAGATO, Keiko

WEKO 5118

NAGATO, Keiko

Search repository
吉田, 俊和

× 吉田, 俊和

WEKO 5119

吉田, 俊和

Search repository
YOSHIDA, Toshikazu

× YOSHIDA, Toshikazu

WEKO 5120

YOSHIDA, Toshikazu

Search repository
佐伯, 道治

× 佐伯, 道治

WEKO 5121

佐伯, 道治

Search repository
SAHEKI, Michiharu

× SAHEKI, Michiharu

WEKO 5122

SAHEKI, Michiharu

Search repository
抄録
内容記述 The present study has two purposes. The first is to investigate the differential effects of interview vs. questionnaire method upon personality impression ratings. The second is to cast some lights upon the importance of using not only a "like-dislike" scale but also some scales which represent important personality dimensions. Ninety-nine female undergraduates served as subjects in the interview method. They were given one of three sets of stimulus each of which is composed of two personality traits, and asked to describe orally impressions of each of three stimulus-persons (SP) who were described by each of two traits and by both two traits. Then they were asked to rate impressions of each SP on ten personality-rating scales (7-points) and a "like-dislike" scale (21-points) After description followed by ratings of the first, of the second, and of the third SP, they were asked to answer the questions about changes of denotation of each trait when presented in a set from presented alone, and to rate the relative degree of contribution of the two traits in making impressions of the two-size SP, difficulty of making images of SPs in mind, and the degree of relatedness of the two traits. In the questionnaire method, subjects were two hundreds and fifteen female undergraduates. They were given two sets and were asked to rate six SPs on twelve rating scales, which were composed of the same eleven scales as in the interview method and 7-points "like-dislike" scale. Stimulus sets were also the same as in the interview method. They were not asked to describe SPs verbally. The rersults obtained are as follows : (1) 11 rating scales were classified into three groups, referring results obtained by means of factor analysis. They were designated as the social desirability scales (4 scales), the activity scales (2), and others (5), respectively. (2) Three response patterns were discriminated in terms of the relationship among the three rating values in the set : the averaging, the additive, and the odd. The odd pattern which were unaccountable by any of linear models, appeared more frequently in the interview than the questionnaire method. The rest were, on the other hand, observed more frequently in the questionnaire than in the interview method. (3) Fitness of data obtained to the simple averaging model was better in the questionnaire than in the interview method. (4) The odd pattern appeared more frequently and fitness to the simple averging model was worse in the social desirability scales than in the activity scales.
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述
内容記述 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。
内容記述タイプ Other
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学教育学部
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/bulfep.22.83
ID登録タイプ JaLC
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 03874796
書誌情報 名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科

巻 22, p. 83-102, 発行日 1975-09-30
フォーマット
application/pdf
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
URI
識別子 http://hdl.handle.net/2237/3443
識別子タイプ HDL
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 21:29:13.987653
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3