ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "b33bc89a-b3dd-453f-97a9-42bb9a558c78"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27922", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27922"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027922", "sets": ["2387"]}, "author_link": ["90900"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1996-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "92", "bibliographicPageStart": "69", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "29", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In this essay, I investigate the relation between Pride and Prejudice (PP) and generic conventions of the domestic novel. The domestic novel is a didactic narrative written for a female educational reform. Its rise is in alliance with the middle class ideology. By focusing on Austen\u0027s use of its generic conventions, I demonstrate her self-consciousness about a deception of the middle class ideology. The middle class supplanted aristocratic hegemony by a gender-based value system. They separated the domestic sphere from the public one, and situated the former as a moral center of the whole society. They also insisted that women should contribute to a moral social reform indirectly through domestic surveillance. We can call this mystification of the engendered domestic sphere \"domestic ideology.\" However, while acknowledging the constructive nature of woman\u0027s mind, the middle class inherited a principle of \"coverture\" which defined unequal legal status of woman\u0027s in the marriage. That is, as Hannah More\u0027s Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education exemplifies, domestic ideology is a conservative one with a progressive disguise. PP seems to be a prototype of domestic novels in a sense, for it depends on their generic conventions structurally. However, on the other hand, the novel consistently questions gender distinctions and keeps critical detachment from its own form. That is, PP is characterized by duplicity. This duplicity becomes clear in comparison with Fanny Burney\u0027s Cecilia, or Memoirs of an Heiress (Cecilia). Both novels employ the domestic novel formula. However, while didacticism works as authoritative in Cecilia, it is contested in a dialogic context in PP. In Cecilia, femininity as a social construct is internalized in the heroine\u0027s subject and restricts her passions as the \"inward monitor.\" On the other hand, Austen\u0027s detachment from domestic ideology brings about moral relativity in PP. Actually, duplicity characterizing PP is also observed in middle class women\u0027s discourse. That is, in PP, \"cultural duality\" specific to them is juxtaposed with the conventional narrative structure. The internal tension dramatizes a complex relationship between dominant ideology and women\u0027s critical voice. The two are not so much mutual exclusive as defining itself in terms of the other. Self-reflexivity of the authorial narrator and Elizabeth Bennet epitomizes this dialectics. In conclusion, we may say that Austen applied a method of parody in PP. It is critical of didacticism intended by domestic ideology, but still depends on its conventions structurally. Through this repetition with critical distance, parodic discourse in PP suggests that the intrinsic flaw of ideological discourse can never be explained away.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This essay is an expanded and revised version of the paper presenter at the 47th General Meeting of the Chubu branch of the English Literary Society of Japan on October 7, 1995.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Chiba, Urara", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90900", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-08"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_29_69.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1100000.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_29_69.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27922/files/ivy_29_69.pdf"}, "version_id": "4c28e97c-3f73-4d10-98a5-be77cdcc3dda"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "The Domestic Fiction vs. Women\u0027s Culture in Pride and Prejudice", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The Domestic Fiction vs. Women\u0027s Culture in Pride and Prejudice", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2387"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030120", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-08"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-08", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27922", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The Domestic Fiction vs. Women\u0027s Culture in Pride and Prejudice"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 29

The Domestic Fiction vs. Women's Culture in Pride and Prejudice

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030120
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030120
805373d9-88b9-4a9c-8fe0-aedeabe6f180
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_29_69.pdf ivy_29_69.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-08
タイトル
タイトル The Domestic Fiction vs. Women's Culture in Pride and Prejudice
言語 en
著者 Chiba, Urara

× Chiba, Urara

WEKO 90900

en Chiba, Urara

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 In this essay, I investigate the relation between Pride and Prejudice (PP) and generic conventions of the domestic novel. The domestic novel is a didactic narrative written for a female educational reform. Its rise is in alliance with the middle class ideology. By focusing on Austen's use of its generic conventions, I demonstrate her self-consciousness about a deception of the middle class ideology. The middle class supplanted aristocratic hegemony by a gender-based value system. They separated the domestic sphere from the public one, and situated the former as a moral center of the whole society. They also insisted that women should contribute to a moral social reform indirectly through domestic surveillance. We can call this mystification of the engendered domestic sphere "domestic ideology." However, while acknowledging the constructive nature of woman's mind, the middle class inherited a principle of "coverture" which defined unequal legal status of woman's in the marriage. That is, as Hannah More's Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education exemplifies, domestic ideology is a conservative one with a progressive disguise. PP seems to be a prototype of domestic novels in a sense, for it depends on their generic conventions structurally. However, on the other hand, the novel consistently questions gender distinctions and keeps critical detachment from its own form. That is, PP is characterized by duplicity. This duplicity becomes clear in comparison with Fanny Burney's Cecilia, or Memoirs of an Heiress (Cecilia). Both novels employ the domestic novel formula. However, while didacticism works as authoritative in Cecilia, it is contested in a dialogic context in PP. In Cecilia, femininity as a social construct is internalized in the heroine's subject and restricts her passions as the "inward monitor." On the other hand, Austen's detachment from domestic ideology brings about moral relativity in PP. Actually, duplicity characterizing PP is also observed in middle class women's discourse. That is, in PP, "cultural duality" specific to them is juxtaposed with the conventional narrative structure. The internal tension dramatizes a complex relationship between dominant ideology and women's critical voice. The two are not so much mutual exclusive as defining itself in terms of the other. Self-reflexivity of the authorial narrator and Elizabeth Bennet epitomizes this dialectics. In conclusion, we may say that Austen applied a method of parody in PP. It is critical of didacticism intended by domestic ideology, but still depends on its conventions structurally. Through this repetition with critical distance, parodic discourse in PP suggests that the intrinsic flaw of ideological discourse can never be explained away.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述
内容記述 This essay is an expanded and revised version of the paper presenter at the 47th General Meeting of the Chubu branch of the English Literary Society of Japan on October 7, 1995.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Other
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 29, p. 69-92, 発行日 1996-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:25:27.979328
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3