ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "f759717f-6866-4efc-b72b-e204ff42af68"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27927", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27927"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027927", "sets": ["2387"]}, "author_link": ["90907", "90908"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "The Argument Structure of Resultative Constructions and Some Problems with Their Syntactic Behavior", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1996-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "184", "bibliographicPageStart": "171", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "29", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "One aim of this paper is to investigate the argument structure of resultative constructions such as The gardener watered the tulips flat. Some linguists like Kayne (1984) and Hoekstra (1988) argue that the accusative Case-marked NPs of resultative constructions (henceforth, AccNPs) are the subjects of the small clauses which are headed by the resultative predicates. In this paper, I argue that this assumption is not valid, and that AccNPs are the arguments of the main verbs. As for transitive resultative constructions (henceforth, TRCs), this conclusion is supported by the fact that the middle formation from TRCs is possible. According to Carrier and Randall (1992), however, the middle formation from intransitive resultative constructions (henceforth, IRCs) is impossible. Carrier and Randall argue from this observation that the AccNPs of IRCs are not the arguments of the matrix clauses. But the impossibility of the middle formation from IRCs is explained by the fact that the meaning of middle constructions often contradicts that of IRCs. And under the appropriate contexts, middle verbs are formed from IRCs. This fact seems to indicate that the AccNPs of IRCs are also the arguments of the matrix clauses, as well as those of TRCs. In this paper, I also investigate two syntactic differences between TRCs and IRCs. One difference is the position of adverbs modifying the matrix verbs : while the adverbs modifying the matrix verbs in TRCs can intervene between the AccNPs and the resultative predicates, those in IRCs cannot. The other difference discussed in this paper is the extractability from AccNPs : the extraction from the AccNPs of TRCs is possible, but that from the AccNPs of IRCs is not. I argue that these differences between TRCs and IRCs are reduced to the assumption that the element assigning the thematic roles to AccNPs is different in TRCs and IRCs : the AccNPs of TRCs are theta-marked only by the matrix verbs, but those of IRCs are theta-marked by the complex of the matrix verbs and the resultative predicates. This assumption is needed in explaining the licensing of the AccNPs of IRCs.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "三浦, 郁夫", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90907", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Miura, Ikuo", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90908", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-08"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_29_171.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "664.4 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 664400.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_29_171.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27927/files/ivy_29_171.pdf"}, "version_id": "e0bf4285-beda-4d57-a0b7-cecc24ca48f4"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "結果構文の項構造とその統語的振舞いについて", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "結果構文の項構造とその統語的振舞いについて", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2387"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030125", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-08"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-08", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27927", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["結果構文の項構造とその統語的振舞いについて"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 29

結果構文の項構造とその統語的振舞いについて

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030125
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030125
a401474a-d595-403f-89fe-31cd2c798fa5
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_29_171.pdf ivy_29_171.pdf (664.4 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-08
タイトル
タイトル 結果構文の項構造とその統語的振舞いについて
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル The Argument Structure of Resultative Constructions and Some Problems with Their Syntactic Behavior
言語 en
著者 三浦, 郁夫

× 三浦, 郁夫

WEKO 90907

ja 三浦, 郁夫

Search repository
Miura, Ikuo

× Miura, Ikuo

WEKO 90908

en Miura, Ikuo

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 One aim of this paper is to investigate the argument structure of resultative constructions such as The gardener watered the tulips flat. Some linguists like Kayne (1984) and Hoekstra (1988) argue that the accusative Case-marked NPs of resultative constructions (henceforth, AccNPs) are the subjects of the small clauses which are headed by the resultative predicates. In this paper, I argue that this assumption is not valid, and that AccNPs are the arguments of the main verbs. As for transitive resultative constructions (henceforth, TRCs), this conclusion is supported by the fact that the middle formation from TRCs is possible. According to Carrier and Randall (1992), however, the middle formation from intransitive resultative constructions (henceforth, IRCs) is impossible. Carrier and Randall argue from this observation that the AccNPs of IRCs are not the arguments of the matrix clauses. But the impossibility of the middle formation from IRCs is explained by the fact that the meaning of middle constructions often contradicts that of IRCs. And under the appropriate contexts, middle verbs are formed from IRCs. This fact seems to indicate that the AccNPs of IRCs are also the arguments of the matrix clauses, as well as those of TRCs. In this paper, I also investigate two syntactic differences between TRCs and IRCs. One difference is the position of adverbs modifying the matrix verbs : while the adverbs modifying the matrix verbs in TRCs can intervene between the AccNPs and the resultative predicates, those in IRCs cannot. The other difference discussed in this paper is the extractability from AccNPs : the extraction from the AccNPs of TRCs is possible, but that from the AccNPs of IRCs is not. I argue that these differences between TRCs and IRCs are reduced to the assumption that the element assigning the thematic roles to AccNPs is different in TRCs and IRCs : the AccNPs of TRCs are theta-marked only by the matrix verbs, but those of IRCs are theta-marked by the complex of the matrix verbs and the resultative predicates. This assumption is needed in explaining the licensing of the AccNPs of IRCs.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 29, p. 171-184, 発行日 1996-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:24:55.617356
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3