ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5ca9dc58-5865-4535-b214-7a69d10a15fe"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27966", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27966"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027966", "sets": ["2389"]}, "author_link": ["91117"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1998-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "86", "bibliographicPageStart": "61", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "31", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper discusses the syntactic structure of the sentences that include conjoined wh-phrases, as given in (1). I call these sentences conjoined wh­-questions. (1) a. When and where did you see them? b. When and with what did John hit Bill? Browne (1972) and Grimshaw (1978) observes that conjoined wh-questions are acceptable only when both of the wh-phrases are optional elements, that is, adjuncts. The examples in (2) show that the conjunction of an argument wh-­phrase and an adjunct wh-phrase is not allowed. The example in (3) shows that the conjunction of two argument wh-phrases that do not originate in the same syntactic position are not allowed.  (2) a. *What and how hard did John kick? b. *What and when did he give you? (3) *John asked who and what bought. If two argument wh-phrases originate in the same syntactic position, they can be conjoined, as in (4). (4) a. Who and whose brother did you like? b. Who and what did you see? In (4) both who and whose brother are the objects of the same verb. In this paper, I propose that examples like (1) are Right Node Raising (RNR) constructions, while examples like (4) are questions in which conjoined wh-phrases are fronted. In other words, (1) and (4)ere different constructions, though they have a superficial resemblance. The ungrammaticality of (2-3) is derived from constraints on RNR. If we analyze (1) as questions in which conjoined wh-phrases are fronted, we must admit the conjunction of elements that do not belong to the same semantic category. In (1), for example, where is a locative, and when is a temporal. But there is evidence to show that the conjunction of elements that do not belong to the same semantic category is not allowed. The RNR approach can explain the behavior of the conjoined wh-questions in (1) without using such conjunctions. On the other hand, in (4) the conjoined wh-phrases belong to the same semantic category. Thus, nothing forces us to analyze (4) as RNR.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Takekoshi, Atsushi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91117", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-10"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_31_61.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "975.1 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 975100.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_31_61.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27966/files/ivy_31_61.pdf"}, "version_id": "384ac78a-011c-46f9-b392-0f8ea43a044a"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "A Note on Conjoined Wh-Questions", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "A Note on Conjoined Wh-Questions", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2389"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030164", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-10"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-10", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27966", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["A Note on Conjoined Wh-Questions"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 31

A Note on Conjoined Wh-Questions

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030164
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030164
b6a159c9-8535-4a96-9fb5-ab0322cd9fd7
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_31_61.pdf ivy_31_61.pdf (975.1 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-10
タイトル
タイトル A Note on Conjoined Wh-Questions
言語 en
著者 Takekoshi, Atsushi

× Takekoshi, Atsushi

WEKO 91117

en Takekoshi, Atsushi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 This paper discusses the syntactic structure of the sentences that include conjoined wh-phrases, as given in (1). I call these sentences conjoined wh­-questions. (1) a. When and where did you see them? b. When and with what did John hit Bill? Browne (1972) and Grimshaw (1978) observes that conjoined wh-questions are acceptable only when both of the wh-phrases are optional elements, that is, adjuncts. The examples in (2) show that the conjunction of an argument wh-­phrase and an adjunct wh-phrase is not allowed. The example in (3) shows that the conjunction of two argument wh-phrases that do not originate in the same syntactic position are not allowed. (2) a. *What and how hard did John kick? b. *What and when did he give you? (3) *John asked who and what bought. If two argument wh-phrases originate in the same syntactic position, they can be conjoined, as in (4). (4) a. Who and whose brother did you like? b. Who and what did you see? In (4) both who and whose brother are the objects of the same verb. In this paper, I propose that examples like (1) are Right Node Raising (RNR) constructions, while examples like (4) are questions in which conjoined wh-phrases are fronted. In other words, (1) and (4)ere different constructions, though they have a superficial resemblance. The ungrammaticality of (2-3) is derived from constraints on RNR. If we analyze (1) as questions in which conjoined wh-phrases are fronted, we must admit the conjunction of elements that do not belong to the same semantic category. In (1), for example, where is a locative, and when is a temporal. But there is evidence to show that the conjunction of elements that do not belong to the same semantic category is not allowed. The RNR approach can explain the behavior of the conjoined wh-questions in (1) without using such conjunctions. On the other hand, in (4) the conjoined wh-phrases belong to the same semantic category. Thus, nothing forces us to analyze (4) as RNR.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 31, p. 61-86, 発行日 1998-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:24:04.341682
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3