{"_buckets": {"deposit": "46dff991-50e6-4528-9808-45c5fc052d27"}, "_deposit": {"id": "28025", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "28025"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028025"}, "item_10_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2019-01", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "71", "bibliographicPageStart": "65", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "29", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "HIP International"}]}]}, "item_10_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 28-mm ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to those of 32-mm CoC during a 5- to 15-year follow-up period. Methods: 107 joints (95 women and 6 men) underwent 28-mm CoC, and 60 (49 women and 7 men) underwent 32-mm CoC. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 56.1 and 55.7 years in the 28-mm and 32-mm CoC groups, respectively. Clinical and radiologic measurements of all patients were analysed. Results: The mean preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was similar in the 2 groups (28-mm, 58.9; and 32-mm, 58.5). However, at final follow-up, the mean HHS of the 32-mm CoC (91.8) was significantly better than that of the 28-mm CoC (88.2) (p = 0.003), as were the ranges of motion (ROM) for flexion (98.3 \u00b1 13.5\u00b0 vs. 87.3 \u00b1 19.3\u00b0, p \u003c 0.001) and abduction (27.8 \u00b1 14.9\u00b0 vs. 22.1 \u00b1 19.3\u00b0, p = 0.007). The mean wear rate was 0.0044 mm/year for the 28-mm CoC and 0.0044 mm/year for the 32-mm CoC. No ceramic fractures were found in the 2 groups. One joint in the 28-mm CoC (0.9%) required revision owing to progressive osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years, with implant loosening or revision THA as the endpoint, was 98.3% for 28-mm CoC and 100% for 32-mm CoC (p = 0.465). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in ceramic-related complications between the 2 groups. Our study demonstrated that the 32-mm and 28-mm CoC are safe and are associated with good clinical outcomes.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "SAGE Publications"}]}, "item_10_relation_11": {"attribute_name": "DOI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018760971", "subitem_relation_type_select": "DOI"}}]}, "item_10_rights_12": {"attribute_name": "\u6a29\u5229", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_rights": "Higuchi, Y., Seki, T., Hasegawa, Y., Takegami, Y., Morita, D., \u0026 Ishiguro, N. (2019). 32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study. HIP International, 29(1), 65\u201371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018760971. Copyright \u00a9 [2019] (The Author(s)). DOI: [10.1177/1120700018760971]."}]}, "item_10_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "author"}]}, "item_10_source_id_61": {"attribute_name": "ISSN\uff08print\uff09", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1120-7000", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Higuchi, Yoshitoshi"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91274", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Seki, Taisuke"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91275", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Hasegawa, Yukiharu"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91276", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Takegami, Yasuhiko"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91277", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Morita, Daigo"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91278", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Ishiguro, Naoki"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91279", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-15"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "28mm_vs_32mm.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "321.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 321600.0, "url": {"label": "28mm_vs_32mm", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/28025/files/28mm_vs_32mm.pdf"}, "version_id": "62709db7-1f21-45b4-9fe5-9188f3eaa7eb"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "\u30ad\u30fc\u30ef\u30fc\u30c9", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "28-mm ceramic articular", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "32-mm ceramic articular", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "ceramic-on-ceramic bearing", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "total hip arthroplasty", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "wear", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study"}]}, "item_type_id": "10", "owner": "1", "path": ["499/500/501"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030225", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_name_i18n": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2019-05-15"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-15", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "28025", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study"], "weko_shared_id": null}