ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "ff9bb6cd-291e-476c-97e2-d69279624402"}, "_deposit": {"id": "28861", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "28861"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028861", "sets": ["2453"]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他の言語のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Against Linguistic Interpretations of Descartes\u0027s Cogito"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2018-04", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "38", "bibliographicPageStart": "25", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "特別号(2018)", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大学哲学論集"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper clarifies the failure of the linguistic approach in interpreting Descartes\u0027s cogito. Such an approach emerged in the latter half of the last century from analytic philosophy, or more largely speaking, from a modern philosophical paradigm shift often called the linguistic turn and shares an intention with these intellectual trends to reject the epistemological privilege of private introspection from the public perspective of language; this approach proposes a challenging new interpretation of the cogito that is totally free from introspection by reducing its indubitability to a kind of pragmatic feature of the sentences \"I think\" or \"I am\", namely, that these two sentences can never be uttered without being true. First, I review some principal examples of the interpretation, taking Ayer\u0027s work as its original sketch and Williams\u0027s and Hintikka\u0027s versions as its most sophisticated variations. Then, I indicate two main and general difficulties commonly faced by these attempts: (1) the prejudiced reliance on the validity of so-called logical truths and (2) the merely hypothetical character of the justification that they can give to the sentences \"I think\" or \"I am\" within the pragmatic framework mentioned above, although Descartes himself asserts both sentences categorically in his cogito formula. Finally, taking into consideration Frankfurt\u0027s interpretation which, though clearly aware of the second difficulty, continues to maintain the linguistic approach, I show exactly in what sense I regard this line of interpretation of the cogito as wholly misdirected.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nagpj.2018.25", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学哲学会"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0915-6577", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "岩佐, 宣明"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "94988", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Iwasa, Nobuaki"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "94989", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-12-26"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "nagpj_2018_25.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "968.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 968600.0, "url": {"label": "nagpj_2018_25.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/28861/files/nagpj_2018_25.pdf"}, "version_id": "47fe2e97-dafb-4fb1-99a7-31373ea83116"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "言語論的コギト解釈に抗して", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "言語論的コギト解釈に抗して"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2453"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nagpj.2018.25", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2019-12-26"}, "publish_date": "2019-12-26", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "28861", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["言語論的コギト解釈に抗して"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. 名古屋大学哲学論集
  4. 特別号(2018)

言語論的コギト解釈に抗して

https://doi.org/10.18999/nagpj.2018.25
https://doi.org/10.18999/nagpj.2018.25
9842ae52-7eb7-4108-b421-6ac16a92c136
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
nagpj_2018_25.pdf nagpj_2018_25.pdf (968.6 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-12-26
タイトル
タイトル 言語論的コギト解釈に抗して
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Against Linguistic Interpretations of Descartes's Cogito
著者 岩佐, 宣明

× 岩佐, 宣明

WEKO 94988

岩佐, 宣明

Search repository
Iwasa, Nobuaki

× Iwasa, Nobuaki

WEKO 94989

Iwasa, Nobuaki

Search repository
抄録
内容記述 This paper clarifies the failure of the linguistic approach in interpreting Descartes's cogito. Such an approach emerged in the latter half of the last century from analytic philosophy, or more largely speaking, from a modern philosophical paradigm shift often called the linguistic turn and shares an intention with these intellectual trends to reject the epistemological privilege of private introspection from the public perspective of language; this approach proposes a challenging new interpretation of the cogito that is totally free from introspection by reducing its indubitability to a kind of pragmatic feature of the sentences "I think" or "I am", namely, that these two sentences can never be uttered without being true. First, I review some principal examples of the interpretation, taking Ayer's work as its original sketch and Williams's and Hintikka's versions as its most sophisticated variations. Then, I indicate two main and general difficulties commonly faced by these attempts: (1) the prejudiced reliance on the validity of so-called logical truths and (2) the merely hypothetical character of the justification that they can give to the sentences "I think" or "I am" within the pragmatic framework mentioned above, although Descartes himself asserts both sentences categorically in his cogito formula. Finally, taking into consideration Frankfurt's interpretation which, though clearly aware of the second difficulty, continues to maintain the linguistic approach, I show exactly in what sense I regard this line of interpretation of the cogito as wholly misdirected.
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学哲学会
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/nagpj.2018.25
ID登録タイプ JaLC
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0915-6577
書誌情報 名古屋大学哲学論集

巻 特別号(2018), p. 25-38, 発行日 2018-04
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 09:48:30.378437
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3