{"_buckets": {"deposit": "a12e90c1-4487-4583-88f2-8fb15bae40e7"}, "_deposit": {"id": "29539", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "29539"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00029539", "sets": ["2488"]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他の言語のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Reexamining the Significance of “Lesson Analysis” and “Relativistic Relation Research Methods” in the Division of Methods of Education at Nagoya University as Educational Evaluation"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "155", "bibliographicPageStart": "139", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "66", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper aims to investigate the history of collaborative research in the Division of Methods of Education at Nagoya University and to clarify the implications of two major joint studies in terms of educational evaluation. Professor Shigematsu Takayasu and Professor Ueda Kaoru began the studies on “Lesson Analysis” and the “Relativistic Relation Research Method” (R.R. Method) in the 1950s- 60s. It can be claimed that both studies have substantial differences in terms of research method and data collection. While Lesson Analysis uses the case study method and collects the detailed records of the learning process during the lesson focusing on the individuality of learners, the R.R. method employs a large-scale survey and collects the patterns of the responses in the questionnaire focusing on the typology of learning style. However, the research methodology of both studies shares the same paradigm, that is, dynamic relativism aimed at revealing learners’ thinking systems from a holistic perspective. Recently, more and more demands for evidence-based decision-making in education are arising, despite the threats to teachers’ professionalism and individually customized teaching. Thus, alternative views of educational evaluation are needed, and it is helpful to look back at the unique research methods employed at Nagoya University.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nueduca.66.2.139", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN（print）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1346-0307", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "柴田, 好章"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "97078", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "石原, 正敬"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "97079", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "SHIBATA, Yoshiaki"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "97080", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "ISHIHARA, Masataka"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "97081", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-04-02"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "11_nuedu660210.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "746.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 746000.0, "url": {"label": "11_nuedu660210.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/29539/files/11_nuedu660210.pdf"}, "version_id": "3074d2df-714a-4314-b5b1-88822995288e"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "名古屋大学教育方法研究室における「授業分析」と「R.R. 方式」の教育評価論としての意義の再検討", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "名古屋大学教育方法研究室における「授業分析」と「R.R. 方式」の教育評価論としての意義の再検討"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2488"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.66.2.139", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2020-04-02"}, "publish_date": "2020-04-02", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "29539", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["名古屋大学教育方法研究室における「授業分析」と「R.R. 方式」の教育評価論としての意義の再検討"], "weko_shared_id": null}