ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • コミュニティ
  • ランキング
AND
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "8e868dab-bc51-47a1-a29f-172d2d9abae6"}, "_deposit": {"id": "29950", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "29950"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00029950"}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "51", "bibliographicPageStart": "35", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "5", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "Nagoya University Asian Law Bulletin"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In Korea, the Constitution was amended in 1987 (generally referred to as the Constitution of the 6th Republic), heralding Korea\u2019s era of democratization. After the democratization, the Constitutional Court of Korea is working very actively and attracting attention globally.  In this article, the following topics are discussed: 1) The history of the constitutional review system after the founding of the Republic of Korea, 2) An overview of the present Constitutional Court, and 3) The problem of \u2018political judicialization\u2019 that has appeared in the court cases. The Constitutional Court of Korea basically models the German Constitutional Court.  However, unlike in Germany, there are some very Korean characteristics. From the viewpoint of its organization, the Korean Constitutional Court has nine judges who passed the exam for the legal profession. Three of the nine judges must be nominated by Parliament, three by Chief Justice of Supreme Court, and three by President. While this is believed to be in consideration of the separation of powers, in reality, the influence of the President is relatively significant. From the viewpoint of its function, unlike the German Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court of Korea has no authority for abstract normative control, and concrete normative control is done only for laws. The reason for no abstract normative control is that the Constitutional Court does not have to take a position over the Parliament. On the other hand, since the Constitutional Court\u0027s decision has the power to invalidate the law, it still has a significant influence on legislation. For this reason, the Constitutional Court has made judgments to allow room for legislative discretion by using various judgment methods called \u2018transformation decisions\u2019 in consideration to the legislature. However, its positive activities have created the phenomenon of \u2018politicization of justice\u2019 or \u2018judicialization of politics\u2019. It is examined in this article, how the Constitutional Court can be positioned for democracy and political processes through analysis of the role of the Constitutional Court from the relationship with the political sector.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID\u767b\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/calealb.5.35", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u6cd5\u653f\u56fd\u969b\u6559\u80b2\u5354\u529b\u7814\u7a76\u30bb\u30f3\u30bf\u30fc\uff08CALE\uff09"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_61": {"attribute_name": "ISSN\uff08Online\uff09", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "2188-1952", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "KOKUBUN, Noriko"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "98447", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-14"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1200000.0, "url": {"label": "alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/29950/files/alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf"}, "version_id": "a3a84c99-02ed-4b8e-b015-3bab21000500"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1604/1605/1921/2498"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/calealb.5.35", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2020-05-14"}, "publish_date": "2020-05-14", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "29950", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. H170 法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)
  2. H170b 紀要
  3. Nagoya University Asian Law Bulletin
  4. 5

Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy

https://doi.org/10.18999/calealb.5.35
0901a35e-d4da-4edc-9c20-30ef7d5e6edf
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2020-05-14
タイトル
タイトル Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy
著者 KOKUBUN, Noriko

× KOKUBUN, Noriko

WEKO 98447

KOKUBUN, Noriko

Search repository
抄録
内容記述 In Korea, the Constitution was amended in 1987 (generally referred to as the Constitution of the 6th Republic), heralding Korea’s era of democratization. After the democratization, the Constitutional Court of Korea is working very actively and attracting attention globally. In this article, the following topics are discussed: 1) The history of the constitutional review system after the founding of the Republic of Korea, 2) An overview of the present Constitutional Court, and 3) The problem of ‘political judicialization’ that has appeared in the court cases. The Constitutional Court of Korea basically models the German Constitutional Court. However, unlike in Germany, there are some very Korean characteristics. From the viewpoint of its organization, the Korean Constitutional Court has nine judges who passed the exam for the legal profession. Three of the nine judges must be nominated by Parliament, three by Chief Justice of Supreme Court, and three by President. While this is believed to be in consideration of the separation of powers, in reality, the influence of the President is relatively significant. From the viewpoint of its function, unlike the German Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court of Korea has no authority for abstract normative control, and concrete normative control is done only for laws. The reason for no abstract normative control is that the Constitutional Court does not have to take a position over the Parliament. On the other hand, since the Constitutional Court's decision has the power to invalidate the law, it still has a significant influence on legislation. For this reason, the Constitutional Court has made judgments to allow room for legislative discretion by using various judgment methods called ‘transformation decisions’ in consideration to the legislature. However, its positive activities have created the phenomenon of ‘politicization of justice’ or ‘judicialization of politics’. It is examined in this article, how the Constitutional Court can be positioned for democracy and political processes through analysis of the role of the Constitutional Court from the relationship with the political sector.
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/calealb.5.35
ID登録タイプ JaLC
ISSN(Online)
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2188-1952
書誌情報 Nagoya University Asian Law Bulletin

巻 5, p. 35-51, 発行日 2020-03-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 09:20:20.686679
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley CiteULike Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

Export

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio