WEKO3
アイテム
Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy
https://doi.org/10.18999/calealb.5.35
https://doi.org/10.18999/calealb.5.350901a35e-d4da-4edc-9c20-30ef7d5e6edf
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
alb5_03_Kokubun.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-05-14 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Korean Constitutional Court and Democracy | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 著者 |
KOKUBUN, Noriko
× KOKUBUN, Noriko |
|||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In Korea, the Constitution was amended in 1987 (generally referred to as the Constitution of the 6th Republic), heralding Korea’s era of democratization. After the democratization, the Constitutional Court of Korea is working very actively and attracting attention globally. In this article, the following topics are discussed: 1) The history of the constitutional review system after the founding of the Republic of Korea, 2) An overview of the present Constitutional Court, and 3) The problem of ‘political judicialization’ that has appeared in the court cases. The Constitutional Court of Korea basically models the German Constitutional Court. However, unlike in Germany, there are some very Korean characteristics. From the viewpoint of its organization, the Korean Constitutional Court has nine judges who passed the exam for the legal profession. Three of the nine judges must be nominated by Parliament, three by Chief Justice of Supreme Court, and three by President. While this is believed to be in consideration of the separation of powers, in reality, the influence of the President is relatively significant. From the viewpoint of its function, unlike the German Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court of Korea has no authority for abstract normative control, and concrete normative control is done only for laws. The reason for no abstract normative control is that the Constitutional Court does not have to take a position over the Parliament. On the other hand, since the Constitutional Court's decision has the power to invalidate the law, it still has a significant influence on legislation. For this reason, the Constitutional Court has made judgments to allow room for legislative discretion by using various judgment methods called ‘transformation decisions’ in consideration to the legislature. However, its positive activities have created the phenomenon of ‘politicization of justice’ or ‘judicialization of politics’. It is examined in this article, how the Constitutional Court can be positioned for democracy and political processes through analysis of the role of the Constitutional Court from the relationship with the political sector. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 名古屋大学法政国際教育協力研究センター（CALE） | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18999/calealb.5.35 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ISSN（Online） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2188-1952 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : Nagoya University Asian Law Bulletin 巻 5, p. 35-51, 発行日 2020-03-31 |
|||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
