ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "87eb4b72-ea86-484c-bed8-309e53be6bdd"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30825", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30825"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00030825", "sets": ["2560"]}, "author_link": ["102138", "102139"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-08", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "64", "bibliographicPageStart": "51", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "19", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "CALE Discussion Paper", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper examines how Singapore’s courts have navigated their role in constitutional adjudication within the context of a strong state. Singapore’s courts have generally adopted an attitude tending toward deference to the political branches in constitutional adjudication, which stems from the common law conception of judicial power and their position as actors within a dominant party democracy. Courts, however, have nevertheless consistently sought to uphold and entrench their judicial independence. Moreover, they have developed and applied doctrines of public law for at least three purposes: to ensure that representative democracy remains the basis of legitimate power in Singapore; to maintain the principle of legality alongside due deference as a limit on all exercises of power; and to structure harmonious and deliberative political discourse in society. In doing so, Singapore’s courts have defended and defined a clear role for themselves as constitutional adjudicators, suited to Singapore’s legal and political context.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Emergence and Features of the Constitutional Review Bodies in Asia : A Comparative Analysis of Transitional Countries’ Development. Edited by Aziz Ismatov and Emi Makino", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/caledp.19.51", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_9_relation_43": {"attribute_name": "関連情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isVersionOf", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "https://cale.law.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publications", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Neo, Jaclyn L", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102138", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Teo, Marcus", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102139", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-11-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "937.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 937000.0, "url": {"label": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/30825/files/caledp_19_51.pdf"}, "version_id": "e27197e7-fa63-4a63-97f1-bdd7550fc352"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2560"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.19.51", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2020-11-16"}, "publish_date": "2020-11-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30825", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. H170 法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)
  2. H170b 紀要
  3. CALE Discussion Paper
  4. 19

Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore

https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.19.51
https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.19.51
9b7e377f-c6a0-4e9b-b11a-a07a64b595d7
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
caledp_19_51.pdf caledp_19_51.pdf (937.0 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2020-11-16
タイトル
タイトル Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore
言語 en
著者 Neo, Jaclyn L

× Neo, Jaclyn L

WEKO 102138

en Neo, Jaclyn L

Search repository
Teo, Marcus

× Teo, Marcus

WEKO 102139

en Teo, Marcus

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 This paper examines how Singapore’s courts have navigated their role in constitutional adjudication within the context of a strong state. Singapore’s courts have generally adopted an attitude tending toward deference to the political branches in constitutional adjudication, which stems from the common law conception of judicial power and their position as actors within a dominant party democracy. Courts, however, have nevertheless consistently sought to uphold and entrench their judicial independence. Moreover, they have developed and applied doctrines of public law for at least three purposes: to ensure that representative democracy remains the basis of legitimate power in Singapore; to maintain the principle of legality alongside due deference as a limit on all exercises of power; and to structure harmonious and deliberative political discourse in society. In doing so, Singapore’s courts have defended and defined a clear role for themselves as constitutional adjudicators, suited to Singapore’s legal and political context.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述
内容記述 Emergence and Features of the Constitutional Review Bodies in Asia : A Comparative Analysis of Transitional Countries’ Development. Edited by Aziz Ismatov and Emi Makino
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Other
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/caledp.19.51
ID登録タイプ JaLC
関連情報
関連タイプ isVersionOf
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 https://cale.law.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publications
書誌情報 en : CALE Discussion Paper

巻 19, p. 51-64, 発行日 2020-08
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 08:42:13.669776
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3