{"_buckets": {"deposit": "87eb4b72-ea86-484c-bed8-309e53be6bdd"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30825", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30825"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00030825"}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-08", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "64", "bibliographicPageStart": "51", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "19", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "CALE Discussion Paper"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper examines how Singapore\u2019s courts have navigated their role in constitutional adjudication within the context of a strong state. Singapore\u2019s courts have generally adopted an attitude tending toward deference to the political branches in constitutional adjudication, which stems from the common law conception of judicial power and their position as actors within a dominant party democracy. Courts, however, have nevertheless consistently sought to uphold and entrench their judicial independence. Moreover, they have developed and applied doctrines of public law for at least three purposes: to ensure that representative democracy remains the basis of legitimate power in Singapore; to maintain the principle of legality alongside due deference as a limit on all exercises of power; and to structure harmonious and deliberative political discourse in society. In doing so, Singapore\u2019s courts have defended and defined a clear role for themselves as constitutional adjudicators, suited to Singapore\u2019s legal and political context.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "\u5185\u5bb9\u8a18\u8ff0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Emergence and Features of the Constitutional Review Bodies in Asia : A Comparative Analysis of Transitional Countries\u2019 Development. Edited by Aziz Ismatov and Emi Makino", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID\u767b\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/caledp.19.51", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u6cd5\u653f\u56fd\u969b\u6559\u80b2\u5354\u529b\u7814\u7a76\u30bb\u30f3\u30bf\u30fc(CALE)"}]}, "item_9_relation_43": {"attribute_name": "\u7570\u7248\u3067\u3042\u308b", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isVersionOf", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "http://cale.law.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publication/DiscussionPaper.html", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Neo, Jaclyn L"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102138", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Teo, Marcus"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102139", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-11-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "937.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 937000.0, "url": {"label": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/30825/files/caledp_19_51.pdf"}, "version_id": "e27197e7-fa63-4a63-97f1-bdd7550fc352"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1604/1605/1611/2560"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.19.51", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2020-11-16"}, "publish_date": "2020-11-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30825", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore"], "weko_shared_id": null}