{"_buckets": {"deposit": "87eb4b72-ea86-484c-bed8-309e53be6bdd"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30825", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30825"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00030825", "sets": ["2560"]}, "author_link": ["102138", "102139"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-08", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "64", "bibliographicPageStart": "51", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "19", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "CALE Discussion Paper", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper examines how Singapore’s courts have navigated their role in constitutional adjudication within the context of a strong state. Singapore’s courts have generally adopted an attitude tending toward deference to the political branches in constitutional adjudication, which stems from the common law conception of judicial power and their position as actors within a dominant party democracy. Courts, however, have nevertheless consistently sought to uphold and entrench their judicial independence. Moreover, they have developed and applied doctrines of public law for at least three purposes: to ensure that representative democracy remains the basis of legitimate power in Singapore; to maintain the principle of legality alongside due deference as a limit on all exercises of power; and to structure harmonious and deliberative political discourse in society. In doing so, Singapore’s courts have defended and defined a clear role for themselves as constitutional adjudicators, suited to Singapore’s legal and political context.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Emergence and Features of the Constitutional Review Bodies in Asia : A Comparative Analysis of Transitional Countries’ Development. Edited by Aziz Ismatov and Emi Makino", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/caledp.19.51", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学法政国際教育協力研究センター(CALE)", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_9_relation_43": {"attribute_name": "関連情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isVersionOf", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "https://cale.law.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publications", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Neo, Jaclyn L", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102138", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Teo, Marcus", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "102139", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-11-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "937.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 937000.0, "url": {"label": "caledp_19_51.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/30825/files/caledp_19_51.pdf"}, "version_id": "e27197e7-fa63-4a63-97f1-bdd7550fc352"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2560"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/caledp.19.51", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2020-11-16"}, "publish_date": "2020-11-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30825", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Constitutional Review in a Strong State: The Case of Singapore"], "weko_shared_id": -1}