WEKO3
アイテム
Near Triviality of Conclusive Reasons
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/6848
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/684809e4abb4-4b5b-4b9a-8246-b6940676c3a5
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
neartrivial.pdf (125.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2006-08-18 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Near Triviality of Conclusive Reasons | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 著者 |
Iseda, Tetsuji
× Iseda, Tetsuji |
|||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to examine a version of externalist epistemology based on the notions of "conclusive reasons" and "decisive indicators", and to decide whether it is a viable option. There are some good points to be taken from existing criticisms of this position, but my judgment is that they fail to block an extreme externalist reply suggested by Suppe. However, at the same time, I show that almost any pair of experiential state and belief can meet the condition of conclusive reasons (or decisive indicators) using stronger counterexamples. Thus, these notions are nearly trivial, and the version of externalism based on these notions is unattractive. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Japan Association for Philosophy of Science | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 04530691 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 巻 14, 号 1, p. 1-20, 発行日 2005 |
|||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 値 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
| URI | ||||||
| 識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/6848 | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | HDL | |||||
