WEKO3
アイテム
「人道的干渉」から「住民保護責任」への転換？
https://doi.org/10.18999/forids.34.67
https://doi.org/10.18999/forids.34.6711c933ce-9d96-49a2-bc0c-56053a32dddd
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
05.pdf (10.7 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2007-03-26 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 「人道的干渉」から「住民保護責任」への転換？ | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | A Meaningful Shift from Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect? | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 著者 |
山形, 英郎
× 山形, 英郎× Yamagata, Hideo |
|||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The new idea of "responsibility to protect" (R2P) was advanced by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty in 2001. It was innovated by the Commission to avoid the word of "humanitarian intervention" and put the debate on the intervention forward. It has obtained the popularity among scholars and diplomats since it was incorporated in 2005 World Summit Outcome adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations. R2P presupposes that sovereignty has dual responsibility, internally to protect citizens within the territory of a state and externally to be accountable for the commission and omission of the state. If the state is unwilling or unable to avert the large scale loss of human lives and the ethnic cleansing, the international community takes the residual responsibility to intervene into that state for the humanitarian purposes. However, R2P cannot always ensure the authorization of the Security Council, because of the exercise of the veto power by one of the permanent members. In the practice of the Council, the large scale of human lives and the ethinic cleansing do not always constitute "the threat to the peace" as a requirement for the action under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. The General Assembly can act to recommend collective measures under the Uniting for Peace resolution in a case where the Security Council is paralyzed by a veto. However the resolution cannot be used by the General Assembly to take military measures, because collective measures involving use of armed force are only available when the existence of the breach of the peace or act of aggression is determined. Therefore R2P does not legalize the humanitarian intervention which is otherwise illegal. R2P is just a play of words. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18999/forids.34.67 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 関連情報 | ||||||
| 関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
| 関連識別子 | http://www.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/bpub/research/public/forum/34/05.pdf | |||||
| ISSN（print） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1341-3732 | |||||
| ISSN（Online） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2189-9126 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 国際開発研究フォーラム en : Forum of International Development Studies 巻 34, p. 67-85, 発行日 2007-03-20 |
|||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 値 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
