{"_buckets": {"deposit": "cea983e2-6572-4722-bef5-738573b397be"}, "_deposit": {"id": "6740", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "6740"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006740"}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "\u305d\u306e\u4ed6\u306e\u8a00\u8a9e\u306e\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Kant et la preuve cart\u00e9siennne"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2006-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "25", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "52", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u6587\u5b66\u90e8\u7814\u7a76\u8ad6\u96c6. \u54f2\u5b66"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Kant a toujours critiqu\u00e9 la preuve ontologique dite cart\u00e9sienne de l\u2019existence de Dieu, non seulement \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9poque de la critique, mais aussi \u00e0 celle de la pr\u00e9-critique o\u00f9 il a tent\u00e9 de sa preuve. Dans le Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Kant a indiqu\u00e9 les difficult\u00e9s logiques de la preuve, en pr\u00e9cisant que l\u2019\u00eatre n\u2019est pas le pr\u00e9dicat r\u00e9el, et le jugement existentiel n\u2019est pas analytique mais synth\u00e9tique, et. etc. Et dans la Nova Dilucidatio, et le Bewisgrund, il a aussi critiqu\u00e9 Descartes, en proposant la preuve unique \u00e0 partir de la possibilit\u00e9 int\u00e9rieure des choses. Comme on le sait bien, Kant a finalement renonc\u00e9 la d\u00e9monstration elle-m\u00eame. Par contre, on peut penser avec D. Henrich que la preuve dite cart\u00e9sienne n\u2019est pas celle de Descartes lui-m\u00eame. Puisque Dieu chez lui est un \u00eatre n\u00e9cesssaire qui contient la puissance de conserver son existence, les difficult\u00e9s loqiques semblent \u00eatre clairement evit\u00e9es. Gassendi et Kant n\u0027ont pas pu admettre cet \u00eatre privil\u00e9gi\u00e9, mais l\u2019admettre ou non, cela d\u00e9pend de la philosophie qu\u2019on choit. Au point de vue de l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie empirique, on ne puisse pas le v\u00e9rifier et la preuve soit logiquement fausse, mais au point de vue de la philosophie rationnelle, l\u2019id\u00e9e de Dieu est clairement et distinctement con\u00e7ue et la d\u00e9monstration est parfaitement justifi\u00e9e. La critique de Kant contre la preuve cart\u00e9sienne montre ce d\u00e9calage, et dans cette perspective l\u2019objection kantienne n\u2019est donc pas valable \u00e0 la tentative de Descartes.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/8399"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID\u767b\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/jouflp.52.1", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u6587\u5b66\u90e8"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN\uff08print\uff09", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0469-4716", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_9_text_14": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a9\u30fc\u30de\u30c3\u30c8", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "\u5c71\u7530, \u5f18\u660e"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "17668", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "YAMADA, Hiroaki"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "17669", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-19"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "yamada.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "2.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 2300000.0, "url": {"label": "yamada.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/6740/files/yamada.pdf"}, "version_id": "231ca4a8-7db0-4e40-8193-cc3b59f3c4ec"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "\u30ab\u30f3\u30c8\u3068\u30c7\u30ab\u30eb\u30c8\u7684\u8a3c\u660e", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "\u30ab\u30f3\u30c8\u3068\u30c7\u30ab\u30eb\u30c8\u7684\u8a3c\u660e"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["326/521/535/827"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/jouflp.52.1", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2007-06-18"}, "publish_date": "2007-06-18", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "6740", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["\u30ab\u30f3\u30c8\u3068\u30c7\u30ab\u30eb\u30c8\u7684\u8a3c\u660e"], "weko_shared_id": 3}