WEKO3
アイテム
制御焦点と集団内における社会的交換 : 寄付シナリオ実験による検討
https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.61.37
https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.61.37cf91f2be-7c3e-47bd-9379-7cb8293ae5a5
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
14o02.pdf (526.7 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2015-03-04 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 制御焦点と集団内における社会的交換 : 寄付シナリオ実験による検討 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Regulatory focus and social exchange in groups: A scenario experiment on donating behavior | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
著者 |
佐藤, 有紀
× 佐藤, 有紀× 五十嵐, 祐× SATO, Yuki× IGARASHI, Tasuku |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | regulatory focus | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | social exchange | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | direct reciprocity | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | indirect reciprocity | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Social exchange in groups is important for the development and welfare of social groups. This study investigated the relationships between actors’ regulatory focus and their social exchange in groups. Based on the regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997), we hypothesized that people with promotion focus (self-regulation based on approaching benefit) would behave more prosocially and expect higher reciprocity in their groups than those with prevention focus (self-regulation based on avoiding cost or risk). Forty-one female students participated in the experiment. After manipulations of regulatory focus, participants responded to a series of questions regarding fictitious donation scenarios: (1) participants decided how much money they would donate to a victim of a natural disaster who belongs to the same university as participants; (2) they estimated how much money the victim would donate to the participants themselves (direct reciprocity) or another student (generalized indirect reciprocity) in a similar situation; and (3) how much money participants would receive from a third-party student in their university if they fell into the same situation in the future (socialized indirect reciprocity). A 2 (regulatory focus) × 3 (types of social exchange) ANOVA revealed that promotion-focused participants donated more money to the victim and expected higher reciprocity, especially in generalized indirect reciprocity, than those who were prevention-focused. The relationship between regulatory focus and preference for social exchange is discussed. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18999/nupsych.61.37 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
ISSN(print) | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1346-1729 | |||||
ISSN(Online) | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 2434-1258 | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学 巻 61, p. 37-45, 発行日 2014-12-26 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher |