ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 刊行物
  3. 名古屋大学人文学フォーラム
  4. 2

ガラスのリアリズム : 中井正一「壁」をめぐって

https://doi.org/10.18999/humfnu.2.33
https://doi.org/10.18999/humfnu.2.33
0b9d22ff-ec5d-49ee-986d-d26145946c79
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
humfnu_2_33.pdf humfnu_2_33.pdf (1.5 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-04-15
タイトル
タイトル ガラスのリアリズム : 中井正一「壁」をめぐって
言語 ja
著者 吉原, 万里矢

× 吉原, 万里矢

WEKO 90583

ja 吉原, 万里矢

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 中井正一
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 板垣鷹穂
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 板ガラス
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 ポスト・ヒューマン
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In ‘the Wall’ (1932), Masakazu Nakai claimed that Sheet Glass used as building materials ha d a new visual effect on people. Sheet Glass began to be mass-produced in Japan from 1920’s, and many buildings used it were constructed after Great Kanto earthquake of 1923. As well as Nakai, Takao Itagaki was also interested in Glass. He thought that it symbolized Realism by drawing out the most reasonable thing in life. Because the use of sheet glass for building is pervasive today, we are hard to imagine, but Glass was considered as important material by some people like Itagaki and Nakai. In 1930’s, people were getting more concerned about machines and materials. But their feelings toward the image of human-into-object, which seems to belong to alienation theory, were ambivalent—expectations or fears at the same time. Nakai also thought that the development of capitalism took away subjectivity and transformed people into objects. But he tried not to reestablish subjectivity but to transform one’s self as an object positively. He tried not to build a binomial confrontation between human body and objects, but to build an inseparable relationship by studying Le Corbusier, Oskar Becker, and Ernst Cassirer. He called the inseparable relationship ‘standardization’. It was his own dialectic thinking, which fluidize the separation between subject and object. Meditation between the two things was called ‘Mittel’. Furthermore, he rephrased ‘Mittel’ to ‘a Canvas’, which fulfill ‘the cutting’ between subject and object. He thought that Sheet Glass was the canvas. Glass makes people who see others as subject in a building object seen from outside a building. For Nakai, who tried to explore his post-human thinking, that is, fluidizing a border between human and objects, Glass which fluidize dichotomy was a training apparatus for achieving a state of the human-into-object.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学大学院人文学研究科図書・論集委員会
言語 ja
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/humfnu.2.33
ID登録タイプ JaLC
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 2433-2321
書誌情報 ja : 名古屋大学人文学フォーラム

巻 2, p. 33-42, 発行日 2019-03-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:32:06.413396
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3