WEKO3
アイテム
ガラスのリアリズム : 中井正一「壁」をめぐって
https://doi.org/10.18999/humfnu.2.33
https://doi.org/10.18999/humfnu.2.330b9d22ff-ec5d-49ee-986d-d26145946c79
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
humfnu_2_33.pdf (1.5 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2019-04-15 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | ガラスのリアリズム : 中井正一「壁」をめぐって | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
著者 |
吉原, 万里矢
× 吉原, 万里矢 |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 中井正一 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 板垣鷹穂 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 板ガラス | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | ポスト・ヒューマン | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In ‘the Wall’ (1932), Masakazu Nakai claimed that Sheet Glass used as building materials ha d a new visual effect on people. Sheet Glass began to be mass-produced in Japan from 1920’s, and many buildings used it were constructed after Great Kanto earthquake of 1923. As well as Nakai, Takao Itagaki was also interested in Glass. He thought that it symbolized Realism by drawing out the most reasonable thing in life. Because the use of sheet glass for building is pervasive today, we are hard to imagine, but Glass was considered as important material by some people like Itagaki and Nakai. In 1930’s, people were getting more concerned about machines and materials. But their feelings toward the image of human-into-object, which seems to belong to alienation theory, were ambivalent—expectations or fears at the same time. Nakai also thought that the development of capitalism took away subjectivity and transformed people into objects. But he tried not to reestablish subjectivity but to transform one’s self as an object positively. He tried not to build a binomial confrontation between human body and objects, but to build an inseparable relationship by studying Le Corbusier, Oskar Becker, and Ernst Cassirer. He called the inseparable relationship ‘standardization’. It was his own dialectic thinking, which fluidize the separation between subject and object. Meditation between the two things was called ‘Mittel’. Furthermore, he rephrased ‘Mittel’ to ‘a Canvas’, which fulfill ‘the cutting’ between subject and object. He thought that Sheet Glass was the canvas. Glass makes people who see others as subject in a building object seen from outside a building. For Nakai, who tried to explore his post-human thinking, that is, fluidizing a border between human and objects, Glass which fluidize dichotomy was a training apparatus for achieving a state of the human-into-object. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 名古屋大学大学院人文学研究科図書・論集委員会 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18999/humfnu.2.33 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
ISSN(print) | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 2433-2321 | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 名古屋大学人文学フォーラム 巻 2, p. 33-42, 発行日 2019-03-31 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher |